This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Review of Regional Studies
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Dan Rickman Best Paper Award Winner
    • SRSA Fellows Address
    • SRSA Presidential Address
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Call for Papers
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:46833/feed
P-ISSN 0048-749X
E-ISSN 1553-0892
Articles
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 1987May 03, 1987 CDT

Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Comparison of Five “Ready-Made” Model Systems

Sharon M. Brucker, Steven E. Hastings, William R. Latham III,
history of modelsinput-output methods
Copyright Logoccby-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.9339
Photo by José Alejandro Cuffia on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 17, Issue 2, 1987

Vol. 17, Issue 2, 1987
  • A Fiscal Impact Model for Virginia Counties
    Brent M. SwallowThomas G. Johnson
  • An Aggregate Model of Manufacturing Firm Migration
    Stephen P. CoelenRobert A. NakosteenMichael A. Zimmer
  • Income Inequality and Urban-Rural Migration
    D.J. SlottjeK.J. Hayes
  • Chamberlin's Solution in a Spatial Market
    Bruce L. BensonRobert M. Feinberg
  • Shortcut Multiplier Formulas for Interregional Input-Output Models
    Joseph L. KatzRoger L. Burford
  • Comments on "Ready-Made" Input-Output Models in Regional Analysis
    William H. MiernykBenjamin H. StevensR.C. JensenHugh W. KnoxJeffrey I. RoundPhillip J. Bourque
  • Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Comparison of Five "Ready-Made" Model Systems
    Sharon M. BruckerSteven E. HastingsWilliam R. Latham III
Review of Regional Studies
Brucker, Sharon M., Steven E. Hastings, and William R. Latham III. 1987. “Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Comparison of Five ‘Ready-Made’ Model Systems.” Review of Regional Studies 17 (2): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.9339.
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system